Back to customer stories

Customer Story

Meridian Capital Partners

How Meridian Capital Partners locked a defensible MBI debt-stack model in a single session with Energent.ai

The two things I always had to do separately — check whether the rate data was actually current and then write up the assumptions — I did them in the same hour. The assumption summary came out structured enough to drop straight into the memo.
Joris Vandenberghe, Senior Analyst at Meridian Capital Partners
Industry
Private equity
Market
Mid-market buyout
Use case
MBI debt-stack rate data validation & assumption documentation
Meridian Capital Partners

Meridian Capital Partners runs eight to twelve deal processes per year, with management buy-ins accounting for a growing share of volume. The deal team is lean, and Joris owns the full financing methodology on each MBI — sourcing and validating rate data, sizing the debt tranches, and documenting the tax and covenant assumptions that underpin the returns analysis. Unsupported inputs or stale pricing will send the model back from IC for revision.

Two sequential dependencies stalled every MBI financing session

Building a defensible debt-stack model required clearing two blocking dependencies in strict order.

First, the rate data had to be inspected series by series: date coverage confirmed, field structure verified, latest observations checked for staleness. A stale endpoint produces a misleading pricing anchor; the only way to know is to read the files. The manual audit was slow and generated no structured artifact suitable for the IC memo or lender package.

Second, the tax and covenant assumption set — effective tax rate, PIK toggle thresholds, DSCR covenant levels — cannot be derived from rate files. It required a separate resolution step that could only begin once rate validation was complete. One financing methodology session regularly consumed most of a working day.

Energent.ai ran both blocking steps without leaving the tool

The analyst uploaded the rate dataset and reference files. The agent ran the full sequential workflow in one sitting:

No manual spreadsheet audit. No separate follow-on session. No context switch between rate validation and assumption documentation.

Rate coverage audit summary

Programmatic enforcement, not manual approximation

How Joris runs it day-to-day

  1. Upload the rate dataset and reference files at the start of the MBI session.
  2. Review the agent's series inventory and coverage flags before locking any pricing anchors.
  3. Direct the agent through the tax and covenant assumption set, providing deal structure and jurisdiction context.
  4. Export the rate coverage summary and assumption documentation to the IC memo or lender package.

Two-phase workflow collapsed into a single sitting

Tax and covenant assumption set

"Both dependencies resolved in one sitting — that's what mattered. I didn't have to come back the next morning with stale context and pick up where I left off. The model was ready to run the same afternoon." — Joris Vandenberghe, Senior Analyst at Meridian Capital Partners

Back to customer storiesBook a Demo