Highlights
AnnouncementsBenchmark

Harder Data, Same Agent: How GPT-6 Astra Got to the Top

The only one of eight models that rose from v1 to v2: 72.2% → 73.3%. First place on the hard set, 3.3 points over Fable 5.1.

Energent team
Drop-arrow chart of eight models from OfficeQA v1 to v2, GPT-6 Astra highlighted as the only one that rose
Open the full-resolution chart

TL;DR

  • It works for it: about 2.5× the model calls and 4× the tool calls per question of the other seven.
  • It pays for it: $11.46 per question on v2 against Fable 5.1's $1.24.
  • Nothing changed for Energent users. The agent is model-agnostic, so a model that arrived on a Thursday was measured by Friday, and the three corners of the trade-off are now: cheapest GPT-5.6 Terra, balanced Fable 5.1, strongest GPT-6 Astra.

Same test, one more model

The setup is the one from the seven-model post: OfficeQA v1 Hard, 133 questions over 697 Treasury Bulletins, and OfficeQA Pro V2, 90 questions over 1,435 scanned ledgers, the same tools, prompts and step budget, reasoning effort high for every model, one run per model scored by the official scorer. Astra ran on OpenAI's API directly, one run per edition, like every other model on the board.

Results

Accuracy, v1 to v2

The chart at the top of this post shows the eight models as arrows from their v1 score to their v2 score. The table has the numbers.

Modelv1 (133 q)v2 (90 q)Change
GPT-6 Astra72.2%73.3%+1.1
Fable 5.172.2%70.0%−2.2
GPT-5.6 Sol71.4%68.9%−2.5
Opus 574.4%63.3%−11.1
Fable 572.2%57.8%−14.4
GPT-5.6 Terra60.9%54.4%−6.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro56.4%44.4%−12.0
Sonnet 567.7%38.9%−28.8

Accuracy against cost

Accuracy against cost per question for eight models on OfficeQA v1 and v2, with GPT-5.6 Terra, Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra marked cheapest, balanced and strongest

Model$ / question v2Minutes v2Model callsTool calls
GPT-6 Astra$11.4614.856.3142.6
Fable 5.1$1.243.218.117.6
GPT-5.6 Sol$2.126.924.361.9
Opus 5$0.982.717.019.4
Fable 5$2.004.014.819.5
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.633.820.743.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro$1.015.338.436.9
Sonnet 5$0.837.025.933.0

Conclusion

The harder edition separated the field last week; Astra is the first model to close the gap from the other side, by working harder rather than by being cheaper. For Energent users that adds a third corner to the choice we make for you: Terra when cost per question matters most, Fable 5.1 when accuracy and cost both do, Astra when only the answer does.

Thanks

Again to the Databricks team for a benchmark that comes in two editions of the same task. Every model added to the board makes that continuity more valuable.

References

  1. The seven-model post, with the full method and the v1 and v2 tables
  2. GPT-6 Astra model page, OpenAI
  3. OpenAI API pricing
  4. Claude Fable 5.1 model page, Anthropic
  5. OfficeQA Pro V2 dataset, Databricks

Solutions

Hardware

AI-assisted CAD reviews and engineering design workflows.