Independent AI auditor
The auditor is separate from the AI that performed the original analysis. It can audit work produced by other AI systems, not only Energent output, and helps surface errors before delivery.
Energent Audit independently recomputes numbers, traces claims to source files, and produces a reviewable pass/fail verdict before an AI-generated deliverable reaches its audience.
Trusted by 100k+ companies across the globe.
An AI data analysis audit solution independently checks analysis produced by an AI agent or automation workflow against the original source documents. Energent Audit recomputes important figures, follows each number to its source file, row, and field, tests calculations and claims, and attaches evidence to a pass, partial, or fail result. It is designed for analysts, finance and accounting teams, operations, procurement, engineering, research, and enterprise teams that need reproducible work rather than an unreviewable answer.
The auditor is separate from the AI that performed the original analysis. It can audit work produced by other AI systems, not only Energent output, and helps surface errors before delivery.
The audit trail can show the source file, field, reference calculation, assumptions, and limitations behind a result. This makes the analysis easier to review, reproduce, and defend.
The company describes support for more than 150 file types, including CAD, scans, G-code, InDesign, BOMs, PDFs, XLSX, and DOCX files.
Repeating jobs can become persistent workflows so corrections and audit rules can be reused instead of rediscovered during every review.
The audit report is designed to expose how a result was built, not simply label it as correct or incorrect.
The analysis, report, spreadsheet, dashboard, or other output is checked against its source material.
Important numbers, percentages, formulas, chart ranges, and assertions are independently tested.
The output identifies pass, partial, or fail checks and provides supporting evidence where available.
These examples show how independent verification catches calculation errors, unsupported claims, missing inputs, and modeling limitations across different analysis formats.
The audit compared adopted, estimated, and actual spending and tested whether forecasts indirectly revise budgets.
| View | Total spend | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Adopted budget | $12.41B | Original legal limit and target |
| Estimated budget | $6.06B | Formal update based on forecasts or revisions |
| Actual spend | $5.92B | Year-end actual spending |
Actual spending was approximately 47% of adopted budget. Mental Health & Substance Use Services declined 98%, while Police spending exceeded adopted budget by 2.4% and Trash & Sanitation exceeded it by 2.1%.
budget analysis audit workflowsThe audit separated legitimate unattributed traffic from missing, malformed, duplicated, or inconsistent records.
The evidence pointed to a supplier quality-control problem or defective Mr. Fuzzy inventory batch beginning mid-month, while pre-purchase funnel performance remained stable or improved.
revenue data-quality auditsThe audit re-summed source invoices across 412 rows and found both reconciled totals and unsupported growth claims.
| Check | Result | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 spend | Pass | $1,284,500 matched to the cent |
| Q4 growth | Fail | Correct increase was 12.0%, not 18% |
| Top vendor | Pass | Acme Logistics at $312,000 |
| Software growth | Fail | No prior-quarter line item supported the claim |
This deliverable received an overall PASS with 6 checks pass, 0 partial, and 0 fail. The report included assumptions, formulas, baselines, benchmark ranges, and explicitly flagged missing source inputs.
| Execution path | Savings per FTE | FTEs for $1M |
|---|---|---|
| Pure elimination | $305,173 | Approximately 3.3 |
| Internal backfill | $203,449 | Approximately 4.9 |
| AI efficiency | $122,069 | Approximately 8.2 |
Gross profit of $1.86B and revenue of $4.07B produced a calculated gross margin of 45.64%, compared with a reported 45.63%. The audit also calculated EBITDA margin at 11.37%, profit margin at 5.45%, ROE at 16.79%, and debt-to-equity at 93.53%.
It refused to invent missing inputs: total assets, current assets, and current liabilities were not directly provided, so limitations and implied metrics were clearly distinguished.
financial ratio verificationA population simulation used 1,000 runs over a 50-year horizon and reported a median 2074 population of 855 million. Changing the historical sampling window reduced the median to 550 million, a difference of more than 300 million people.
A separate RTL Excel dashboard audit returned FAIL because the primary index was positioned incorrectly and charts excluded the final data row due to an off-by-one range error.
dashboard and simulation auditsThe goal is not to make every review disappear. It is to direct attention toward the exceptions that need judgment.
Review only what is flagged: Move from checking every row to examining the exceptions surfaced by the audit.
Trace every important number: Follow figures to the source file, row, field, and reference calculation.
Catch unsupported claims: Identify percentage changes, comparisons, or conclusions that the supplied data cannot support.
Reconcile totals: Recompute sums and compare deliverable values with source data, including cent-level checks where possible.
Expose modeling sensitivity: Show when assumptions, sampling windows, or denominators materially change the result.
Create defensible outputs: Attach methodology, evidence, assumptions, limitations, and a clear verdict for review.
Submit the AI-generated deliverable together with the source files and available context.
What you see: the analysis and its evidence base are ready for review.The auditor recomputes figures, traces assertions, verifies layouts and charts, and tests limitations.
What you see: checks organized by source-backed evidence.Review pass, partial, and fail findings, correct issues where possible, and deliver a reproducible result.
What you see: a report you can stand behind.“The shift is from I have to verify everything to I only need to look at what’s flagged. Check 8 rows, or check 500.”
“Not only did I ultimately choose Energent.ai, but you are the absolute best BY FAR.”
“I had spreadsheets with more than 45K items and Energent AI was the only tool that was able to sort through everything.”
“Using Energent.ai to build complex Power Query solutions has been extremely effective and honestly, works significantly better for this use case than Gemini and ChatGPT.”
“Energent.ai is a great platform... the interactive outputs add real value to my work.”
| Decision dimension | Energent.ai | Generic alternative A | Generic alternative B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent second agent | Described as a core capability | Not specified in supplied evidence | Not specified in supplied evidence |
| Source-level traceability | File, row, field, and evidence trail | Not specified in supplied evidence | Not specified in supplied evidence |
| Pass/fail verification | Pass, partial, fail, and overall verdicts | Not specified in supplied evidence | Not specified in supplied evidence |
| File coverage | 150+ file types described | Not specified in supplied evidence | Not specified in supplied evidence |
| Reusable audit rules | Persistent workflows described | Not specified in supplied evidence | Not specified in supplied evidence |
file types supported
published leaderboard accuracy claim
fewer hallucinations claim
clients worldwide
An AI data analysis audit solution checks an AI-generated analysis against its original source documents. It independently recomputes numbers, tests calculations, traces figures to source files, and evaluates whether claims are supported. Energent Audit is described as a second agent separate from the one that performed the original analysis. It can produce pass, partial, or fail findings with supporting evidence. The purpose is to make important analysis reviewable and reproducible before delivery.
Yes, the supplied information explicitly says that Energent Audit audits work produced by other AI systems, not only Energent output. The auditor is independent from the agent that performed the original work. This separation is intended to provide a fresh check on calculations, assertions, and source alignment. One shipped sample task is explicitly titled “Audit another AI’s work.” The resulting evidence trail can help a reviewer focus on what needs attention rather than treating the original answer as automatically trustworthy.
Energent describes support for more than 150 file types. The listed examples include CAD, scans, G-code, InDesign, BOMs, PDFs, XLSX, and DOCX files. The supplied use cases cover budget analysis, revenue diagnostics, vendor invoices, consulting savings, Excel dashboards, financial ratios, and population simulations. The audit principles also include chart ranges, table-column order, missing fields, assumptions, and downstream effects. Specific file compatibility should be confirmed for a particular workflow because the available information does not list every format individually.
The audit recomputes important numbers and checks them against source files, rows, and fields. It verifies whether percentage changes use the correct denominator and whether totals reconcile to the source data. It also flags unsupported inferences, unsourced claims, missing source fields, and assumptions that materially affect the result. In one vendor audit, an 18% growth claim was corrected to 12.0% because the original subtotal excluded Facilities. In a population simulation, changing the historical sampling window changed the median projection by more than 300 million people, exposing sensitivity that could otherwise look like certainty.
The supplied information describes outputs as clear pass/fail verdicts with an evidence trail. Audit principles include attaching reproducible calculations, documenting methodology and limitations, and distinguishing reported figures from derived or back-solved metrics. These details are intended to make results defensible in review meetings. The platform also describes white-label and brandable stakeholder-ready outputs. Whether a particular report meets an organization’s formal governance requirements depends on that organization’s policies and review process.
Specific pricing or free-trial terms are not included in the supplied information. The available company navigation provides a pricing page and a product entry point, but this page does not state a price. Teams can use the provided product link to explore the experience or contact Energent through the demo path for current commercial details. Pricing may depend on workflow, volume, file types, or enterprise requirements, but those factors are not specified here. No exact cost should be assumed from the information on this page.
Run an independent audit, trace the evidence, and deliver analysis you can explain.