Source-grounded macro analysis

Analyzing Macro Regimes and Market Volatility

Turn volatility, rates, valuation scenarios, portfolio behavior, and credit conditions into reviewable analysis without leaving verification to guesswork.

126
Recent regime observations
150+
Supported file types
Fewer hallucinations claimed
100k+
Clients worldwide

Trusted by 100k+ companies across the globe.

Amazon
AWS
UC Berkeley
Experian
GE
PwC
Stanford

What Is Macro Regime and Market Volatility Analysis?

Macro regime and market volatility analysis groups changing market conditions into interpretable states, then tests how volatility, interest rates, valuation, portfolio returns, and credit stress behave within those states. In the supplied dashboard, Bull conditions are defined by VIX below 20 with comparatively stable Treasury moves, Bear conditions by VIX above 25 with rapidly rising rates, and Base conditions by the intermediate range. Energent.ai helps teams examine those relationships across complex source files and produce a traceable audit trail for the figures and assertions used in the final deliverable.

The analysis is designed for analysts, finance and accounting teams, operations and procurement groups, engineering teams, researchers, and enterprise users who need reproducible results. It complements the underlying time series rather than replacing them: regime bands, cross-sectional charts, and scenario tables provide context for decisions while the source data remains visible for review.

For teams building a broader research process, the same evidence-first approach can connect macro regime analysis with portfolio, valuation, and credit monitoring workflows.

Macro Regime and Volatility Use Cases

Use the supplied dashboards to move from market context to specific, reviewable questions about risk, returns, valuation, and household credit pressure.

Technical Drawing Gap Analysis dashboard

Classify market regimes

The Macro Regimes Dashboard reports Bull, Base, and Bear states, overlays them on the S&P 500 path, and shows how volatility and Treasury-rate conditions cluster with subsequent outcomes. Over the most recent 126 observations, Bull conditions represented 71.4%, Base conditions 28.6%, and Bear conditions 0.0%.

Open dashboard
Financial Due Diligence red flags dashboard

Translate rates into valuation

The Discount-Rate Macro Scenario Dashboard covers 257 monthly observations from January 2005 through May 2026. It compares risk-free rates, credit spreads, term spreads, Fed Funds, proxy WACC, and present value across Base, Bear, and Bull scenarios.

Open dashboard
Apple financial dashboard with KPI cards and FY2025 table

Compare index risk and resilience

The NASDAQ-100 versus S&P 500 analysis examines rolling returns, ten-year withdrawal resilience, inflation drag, and currency effects. The supplied figures show higher upside and deeper one-year drawdowns for the NASDAQ-100, while the S&P 500 shows lower dispersion and positive worst-case three-year and five-year outcomes.

Open dashboard
Q1 vendor spend audit report with pass fail cards

Monitor consumer credit stress

The US Credit Card Rates and Delinquency Monitor tracks revolving-balance pricing, all-accounts rates, spreads, and delinquency from November 1994 through February 2026. It places current conditions in context: the latest all-accounts rate is 21.00%, the revolving-balance rate is 21.52%, and delinquency is 2.92%.

Open dashboard

What You Get

A practical workflow for turning heterogeneous financial and economic data into decision-ready analysis.

Classify observations using explicit Bull, Base, and Bear logic tied to VIX and Treasury behavior.

Compare forward six-month outcomes, valuation changes, rolling returns, and credit stress across conditions.

Trace each reported number to its source file, row, and field for a reviewable evidence trail.

Recompute analytical numbers and statistical models before they reach stakeholders.

Present stakeholder-ready outputs with pass/fail findings and supporting evidence.

Reuse repeating audit rules as persistent workflows so corrections become permanent controls.

How It Works

Step 1

Bring the source data

Upload or connect the spreadsheets, PDFs, scans, and other files behind the macro analysis.

What you see: source-grounded inputs organized for analysis.

Step 2

Ask and analyze

Use natural-language prompts to examine regimes, rates, returns, inflation, currencies, and delinquency.

What you see: charts, tables, scenario comparisons, and explanations.

Step 3

Audit before delivery

An independent AI auditor recomputes figures, retraces assertions, and returns a pass/fail verdict with evidence.

What you see: a reproducible chain for review.

Features

Core workflow features

  • • Natural-language prompts for high-stakes analysis
  • • Macro regime classification and overlays
  • • Discount-rate and valuation scenario modeling
  • • Rolling-return and withdrawal analysis
  • • Credit-card rate and delinquency monitoring

Reliability & control

  • • Independent AI audit of other AI outputs
  • • Recomputed analytical numbers
  • • Source, row, and field traceability
  • • Pass/fail verdicts with supporting evidence
  • • Reusable workflows that retain audit rules

Integrations & export

  • • Support for 150+ file types
  • • Complex document and spreadsheet support
  • • CAD, G-code, scans, BOMs, PDFs, XLSX, and DOCX support
  • • White-label and brandable stakeholder-ready outputs
  • • High-volume enterprise workflow support

Use Case Data at a Glance

Forward six-month return by regime

10.4%
Bull
1.1%
Base
−13.2%
Bear

Average next-six-month return reported in the Macro Regimes Dashboard.

Discount-rate scenario valuation

RegimeProxy WACCPV
Base4.08%$1,478.6
Bear5.10%$1,376.2
Bull4.02%$1,484.1

Baseline PV anchor: $1,460.6. Scenario range: $1,376.2–$1,484.1.

NASDAQ-100 versus S&P 500 rolling return summary

IndexHolding periodBestMedianWorst
NASDAQ-1001Y67.55%23.73%−32.97%
NASDAQ-1003Y37.12%18.68%7.80%
NASDAQ-1005Y27.40%17.43%11.33%
S&P 5001Y53.71%14.57%−19.44%
S&P 5003Y23.88%11.14%3.04%
S&P 5005Y16.77%13.07%7.31%

To extend this work, teams can pair VIX volatility tracking with technical market analysis, portfolio drawdown planning, or automated financial reporting.

Proof

  • • The recent regime sample contains 71.4% Bull, 28.6% Base, and 0.0% Bear observations across 126 observations.
  • • Reported average next-six-month returns are 10.4% for Bull observations, 1.1% for Base observations, and −13.2% for Bear observations.
  • • The discount-rate dashboard covers 257 monthly observations from 2005-01-01 to 2026-05-01.
  • • All four supplied ten-year withdrawal scenarios in the portfolio analysis survived ten years.
  • • Energent.ai supports 150+ file types and claims 3× fewer hallucinations in public evaluations.

“I had spreadsheets with more than 45K items and Energent AI was the only tool that was able to sort through everything.”

Roberto C., Data Operations Specialist, Fortune 500 Logistics

“Using Energent.ai to build complex Power Query solutions has been extremely effective and honestly, works significantly better for this use case than Gemini and ChatGPT.”

Kay P., Power Query Analyst, Fortune 50 Financial Services

“Energent.ai is a great platform... the interactive outputs add real value to my work.”

Amjad M., Telecommunications Engineer, Fortune 500 Telecommunications

Comparison: Why Energent.ai vs Alternatives

Decision dimensionEnergent.aiManual reviewUnverified AI output
Source traceabilityExact source file, row, and field trailDepends on reviewer processNot necessarily available
Numerical verificationIndependent recomputationHuman recalculationOutput may remain unchecked
Final review signalPass/fail verdict with evidenceReviewer notes and judgmentGenerated narrative
File coverage150+ file typesVaries by team toolsVaries by model and workflow
RepeatabilityReusable workflows and audit rulesMust be recreated or documentedPrompt-dependent

Credentials & Key Stats

94.4%

Accuracy on a published HuggingFace leaderboard, company claim

30%

More accurate than the listed second-place alternative in the comparison

150+

Supported file types, including CAD, scans, and G-code

100k+

Clients worldwide reported by Energent.ai

See the Independent AI Audit

The audit demonstration shows an independent AI agent checking each number, retracing figures to their source, verifying the analysis, and showing how the result was built.

Energent audit report with evidence and pass fail review

FAQs

Macro regime analysis groups market conditions into states such as Bull, Base, and Bear. In the supplied logic, Bull conditions use a VIX below 20 and comparatively stable Treasury moves, while Bear conditions use a VIX above 25 and rapidly rising rates. Base conditions sit between those definitions. The regime labels contextualize the S&P 500 path and related cross-sectional charts. They do not replace the underlying time series or eliminate the need for judgment.
The workflow is intended for analysts, finance and accounting teams, operations and procurement groups, engineering and CAD teams, research groups, and enterprise customers. It is useful when a team must combine source documents with market, rate, portfolio, or credit analysis. Natural-language prompts make the analysis accessible to non-experts, while the audit trail supports specialist review. The supplied examples cover macro regimes, discount-rate valuation, equity portfolio behavior, and credit-card delinquency. The appropriate use depends on the data and controls required by each team.
Energent.ai describes an independent AI auditor that checks outputs produced by other AI agents. It recomputes analytical numbers and traces each figure to the exact source file, row, and field where available. It also verifies financial analysis and complex statistical modeling. The result includes a pass/fail verdict with supporting evidence. This creates a reproducible chain for review instead of leaving verification entirely to a human reviewer.
Energent.ai states that it supports more than 150 file types. The provided examples include CAD files, scans, G-code, InDesign files, bills of materials, PDFs, XLSX files, and DOCX files. This broad coverage is relevant when macro and financial analysis is spread across spreadsheets, reports, and complex documents. The actual result still depends on the quality and structure of the supplied source material. Teams should evaluate their specific file mix in the product workflow or a demonstration.
Yes, reusable workflows are one of the stated core offerings. The company describes workflows that learn audit rules over time, so corrections can become persistent rules for later jobs. This is relevant for recurring regime reports, valuation updates, portfolio reviews, and credit monitoring. Reuse can help keep the process consistent when the source files or observation windows change. Each recurring workflow should still be reviewed against its current inputs and intended analytical logic.
Specific pricing for analyzing macro regimes and market volatility is not provided in the supplied information. Energent.ai offers a pricing page and a book-a-demo path for visitors who need current commercial details. The scope may depend on workflow volume, file types, audit requirements, and enterprise needs, but those factors are not priced here. You can start through the product entry point to understand the experience. For a tailored discussion, use the Book a Demo link rather than relying on an assumed price.

Make macro analysis easier to review.

Explore your market regimes, scenario valuations, portfolio outcomes, and credit indicators with an evidence trail built into the workflow.